Search Term(s):
Blog Tags:
Order by: Date  Relevancy

Your search returned 4 entries.

250 Exonerated, and the Need for Reform

Posted: February 4, 2010 4:40 pm

More than three decades after he was convicted of a crime he didn’t commit, Innocence Project client Freddie Peacock was exonerated at  a hearing this afternoon in Rochester, New York. He became the 250th person exonerated through DNA testing in the United States. His case and those of the 249 before him show how the criminal justice system is flawed and how it can be fixed.

To mark the 250th exoneration, the Innocence Project released a new report today: “250 Exonerated, Too Many Wrongfully Convicted.” Supporters around the country are amplifying the call for reform by sending letters to editors of local newspapers -- send yours here.

Peacock, 60, served more than five years in New York prisons for a rape he didn’t commit before he was released on parole in 1982. For the next 28 years, he fought to clear his name -- even trying to refuse the end of his parole because he thought that remaining in the criminal justice system might make it easier for him to prove his innocence.  

"Freddie Peacock was released many years ago, but he hasn't been truly free because the cloud of this conviction hung over him," Olga Akselrod, the Innocence Project Staff Attorney handling the case, said today.

Peacock’s wrongful conviction sheds light on two of the most common causes of wrongful convictions: eyewitness misidentification and false confessions. Peacock, who has serious mental illness, was arrested and charged with raping a neighbor in 1976 based in part on a questionable eyewitness misidentification. Although he told police that he had been hospitalized for mental illness, they proceeded to interrogate him, eventually alleging that he confessed to the crime, though he could not tell officers where, when or how the victim was raped. He was tried and convicted of the crime and sentenced to up to 20 years in prison.

Learn more about Peacock's case and take action today by sending a letter to your local newspaper.



Tags: Freddie Peacock

Permalink

 

Freddie Peacock's Long Journey to Exoneration

Posted: February 5, 2010 3:15 pm

By Maggie Taylor, Senior Case Coordinator

Yesterday, I had the honor of sharing an incredible day with a person who had previously lived in my mind as handwriting, case documents and a very memorable name — Freddie Peacock. I first heard Freddie’s name in 2005 when I evaluated his case for potential acceptance at the Innocence Project, and I was thinking of his letters yesterday as he finally achieved the exoneration he sought for so long.

In two weeks I'll celebrate my sixth anniversary with the Innocence Project, where I work in the intake and evaluation department.  My job, and the job of eight wonderful colleagues in my department, is to help determine which cases the Innocence Project can accept. To do so, we reconstruct a case as best we can through documents: from the often-heartbreaking letters of prisoners and from lab reports, police reports, trial transcripts and other legal documents. We examine a case from every angle, looking for two things: a viable innocence claim and biological evidence that, if tested, should tell us if the person asking for our help is innocent.  Our jobs, though fascinating and challenging, focus almost exclusively on lives on paper.

When Freddie first wrote to us, his request was different from many of the pleas we read. He needed our help to restore his good name. When I worked up Freddie's case in 2005, it was compelling not only for the biological evidence that could prove his innocence, but because he had been out of prison since 1982, and still fought for exoneration. In fact, Freddie had been off parole since 1992, and before that had voluntarily remained on parole because he thought he would have a better chance of proving his innocence.

He existed in my mind for years as a compelling story but he came to life when I met him on Wednesday. We arrived at his apartment on Wednesday afternoon and were greeted by Freddie, his sister Edith and his longtime friend and advocate Bill Marshall.  Freddie, now 60, is a very tall man, with a genuine smile and brown tortoise shell glasses. Edith had just taken Freddie to the barber and they were planning his court outfit.  Freddie picked up the tie he planned to wear the next day and handed it to Bill, who put it around his own neck, tied it, and put it on Freddie to check the length. 

Freddie sat quietly as staff attorney Olga Akselrod and Cardozo student Jess Smith walked him through what would happen on exoneration day.  As Edith, who was to be the family's official spokesperson at the press conference, prepared for difficult questions, we heard about how Freddie's wrongful conviction had affected the family.  She talked about how worried she had been when Freddie went into prison.  She feared Freddie's mental illness would make him a target of violence, and I thought about the scores of other inmates with mental illnesses who write to us for help.

The courthouse the next day was flooded with reporters and camera operators. The hearing was brief. Edith cried with relief as soon as the judge began signing the paper vacating Freddie's conviction. Olga asked for just three or four minutes to talk about Freddie's ordeal on the record; the judge granted two. No apologies were offered to Freddie. At the end of the hearing the judge wished Freddie luck, and we filed out of the courtroom just ten minutes after we had entered. Edith turned to her friend Jeanette, who had accompanied her, and said how glad she was it was all over, Jeanette silently tucked Edith's hair behind her ear.

At the press conference Olga praised Freddie for his spirit and tenacity in proving his innocence. She noted how terrifying it is to keep reaching out for relief to the same system that wronged you. Innocence Project Co-director Peter Neufeld pressed for laws mandating the recording of interrogations to help prevent false confessions, like the one Freddie allegedly gave police over three decades ago. Freddie sat with his head down, staring at his hands in his lap, as his sister described the burden of his wrongful conviction.
 
After the press conference we called the Innocence Project office so the staff and students could congratulate Freddie, an Innocence Project ritual. When Freddie said hello he was greeted with applause and cheers. He beamed, and laughed, and his sister told everyone on the line, "Y'all are family now."  I've been one of those voices cheering from the other end of the line on many occasions, and it was great to see that call from the other end, how happy it seemed to make Freddie and his sister.

Freddie’s family held a party after the hearing in the rec room of Freddie’s apartment complex. Freddie's family and friends gathered for lasagna, chicken, fruit and sandwiches.  Freddie joked with everyone and talked about basketball with Peter, who noted that he and Freddie were the same age and had the same basketball heroes. Freddie's pastor, who was out of town and couldn't make it to the exoneration, called in with congratulations. Freddie cut a white sheet cake with blue roses that said, "Congratulations, Freddie, it's been a long journey."



Tags: Freddie Peacock

Permalink

 

Media Coverage in Freddie Peacock Case

Posted: February 5, 2010 4:20 pm

Yesterday, Freddie Peacock became the 250th person exonerated by DNA evidence in the United States. We posted background on his case and a new report on the first 250 exonerations.  This afternoon, Innocence Project Senior Case Coordinator Maggie Taylor wrote here about her experience with Peacock’s family at the exoneration hearing in Rochester.

Innocence Project supporters around the world are marking the 250th exoneration by sending letters to newspaper editors in their communities, calling for reforms to prevent future injustice. Send yours here.

Here's a selection of media coverage of yesterday’s exoneration:


New York Times: Vindication Now Arrives After a Battle of 28 Years

Los Angeles Times: DNA Evidence Clears NY Man

Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Article and Video

Dozens more news outlets, TV stations and blogs around the country carried Peacock’s story. Notable blog posts included Simple Justice, The Root, The Agitator, Overbrook Foundation and Black Voices.




Tags: Freddie Peacock

Permalink

 

250 Reasons to Act

Posted: February 11, 2010 3:45 pm

It has been a week since Freddie Peacock became the 250th DNA exoneree in New York, and the news is inspiring support for reforms across the country.

The Rochester Democrat and Chronicle ran an editorial yesterday calling for reforms, and funds, to ensure that the next exoneree doesn’t have to wait 33 years for justice.

Peacock’s wrongful conviction was caused in part by an alleged false confession. In the last several years, New York has led the country in the number of wrongful convictions overturned that involved false confessions.

In an op-ed at the Empire Page, Innocence Project Policy Director Stephen Saloom called for reforms in New York to prevent wrongful convictions, especially the recording of interrogations to prevent false confessions. Saloom wrote:

While it’s encouraging that Monroe County and others are starting to record some interrogations, this shouldn’t be a piecemeal approach with a handful of counties implementing parts of a critical reform on their own. For years, bills have languished in Albany that would require interrogations to be recorded statewide. It’s time for the State Legislature and the Governor to take action. If they don’t, the state’s high court should mandate recording of interrogations.  We owe at least that much to Freddie Peacock.
In another editorial, The Los Angeles Times wrote that shows like “CSI” have fooled us into believing that DNA is tested in every case where it’s needed. That’s not true -- and in fact evidence is often lost or destroyed in cases as old as Peacock’s by the time courts order action.
Saving DNA evidence is not simply a matter of compassion for the wrongfully incarcerated. It should also be a top priority for those who want to see wrongdoers punished. Because for every Frederick Peacock who went to jail for a crime he did not commit, a perpetrator went free.
Innocence Project supporters have sent hundreds of letters to newspaper editors around the country, and the letters have begun to appear in print, helping to spread the word about the issue of wrongful convictions. A letter from Courtney Cotton ran yesterday in the Daily Nonpareil in Council Bluffs, Iowa, and a letter from Scott Tudehope ran in the Tracy (CA) Press.

Send your own letter today.





Tags: Freddie Peacock, False Confessions, False Confessions

Permalink