Search Term(s):
Blog Tags:
Order by: Date Relevancy
Your search returned 41 entries.
Major U.S. Report Calls for "Massive Overhaul" of Forensics
Posted: February 18, 2009 6:43 pm
The National Academy of Sciences released a report this afternoon that could transform forensic science in the United States.
The report, released by a diverse committee of scientific and legal experts who have spent two years studying these issues and holding public hearings at Congress’ request, recommends the creation of an independent, science-based federal entity that would direct comprehensive research and evaluation in the forensic sciences, establish scientifically validated standards and oversee their consistent application nationwide.
Innocence Project Co-Director Peter Neufeld, who testified before the panel at two of its five hearings, said today’s report is a “major breakthrough.”
“For too long, forensic science professionals have not had the support or management needed to identify the real strengths and weaknesses of different assays and techniques,” Neufeld said. “This report provides the roadmap for rectifying that problem, and we look forward to working with Congress and other key stakeholders to implement the report’s recommendations.”And members of Congress reacted to report in the hours after its release.
"People’s lives hinge on the results of these forensic tests and scientific rigor must be applied in each and every case to make sure that justice is truly served,” said U.S. Senator Jay Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. “I will study the National Academy’s recommendations very carefully and propose legislation to address the need for standards, including best practices and certification and accreditation of forensic professionals.”Rep. John Conyers, the chairman of the U.S. House of Represenatives Judiciary Committee, called the report a “wake up call.”
“Our nation’s forensic science community needs our increased support and direction in order to ensure that criminal justice is more science-based, more reliable, and ultimately more just,” Conyers said.Read more reaction from exonerees, crime victims, forensic experts and others here.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Media Coverage of NAS Report
Posted: February 18, 2009 6:40 pm
Below is a sample of media coverage of today’s groundbreaking forensics report from the National Academy of Sciences. We’ll post more coverage tomorrow.
LA Times: Report Questions Science, Reliability of Crime Lab Evidence
Associated Press: Real World CSI's Lack Consistent Standards
CNN: Crime Labs Need Major Overhaul, Study Finds
MSNBC: Crime Labs Are Seriously Deficient, Report Finds
ProPublica: Government-Funded Study Calls for Overhaul of Nation’s Crime Labs
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
More Media Coverage of Forensics Report
Posted: February 19, 2009 5:36 pm
We posted yesterday some feedback and media coverage of the watershed forensics report released by the National Academy of Sciences. Here are some more stories running around the world today. We’ve noted which stories allow comments, so you can click through and join the discussion:
NPR On Point: Crime Labs and Dismal Science - One-hour radio show with Judge Harry Edwards (the co-chair of the committee that published the report), Innocence Project Co-Director Barry Scheck, L.A. County Crime Lab Director Barry Fisher and John Jay College Prof. James Doyle. (Allows comments)
New York Times: Study Calls for Oversight of Forensics in Crime Labs
USA Today: Report: Real-world Police Forensics Don’t Resemble ‘CSI’
LA Times Op-Ed: Clueless ‘Science’
LA Times: Report questions science, reliability of crime lab evidence
NPR Morning Edition: Call for Forensics Overhaul Linked to 'CSI' Effect (Allows Comments)
Simple Justice: National Academies of Science: Trust Nothing (Allows Comments)
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Votes for Reform
Posted: February 23, 2009 11:38 am
An editorial this weekend in the New York Times praised the National Academy of Sciences on its “sensible suggestions” for improvements to forensic science practices in the United States, and called for research into unvalidated disciplines.
The academy’s panel makes sensible suggestions for improvement, such as certification of forensic professionals, accreditation of laboratories, uniform standards for analyzing evidence and independence of the laboratories from police and prosecutors who might bias judgments. In the long run, research is needed to determine the accuracy of forensic methods. For now, judges, lawyers and juries are on notice that high-tech forensic perfection is a television fantasy, not a courtroom reality.And writing in the Austin American-Statesman, author Joyce King (a member of the Innocence Project of Texas Board of Directors) writes that “lawmakers should not ignore” criminal justice reforms proven to prevent wrongful convictions – especially in the wake of Timothy Cole being cleared posthumously.
Read the full editorial here. (New York Times, 02/21/09)
Read King’s op-ed here. (Austin American-Statesman, 02/22/09)
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
New Study on Forensics and Wrongful Conviction
Posted: March 18, 2009 11:15 am
A new law review article by Innocence Project Co-Director Peter Neufeld and University of Virginia Law Professor Brandon Garrett finds that forensic analysts often overstated evidence in wrongful conviction cases. The pair spent over a year reviewing 137 DNA exoneration cases in which a forensic analyst testified at trial, and found that in 60 percent of these cases, the forensic expert gave invalid testimony.
Watch a video with Garrett discussing the paper, and download the full Virginia Law Review paper.
While conducting the research for this paper, both Garrett and Neufeld testified before the National Academy of Sciences committee that recently released a report on the need for forensic reform in the United States. The NAS report called for a new federal agency to oversee and support forensic sciences in order for the disciplines to play a more reliable role in the American court system.
The Innocence Project also recently completed a review of the role of forensic science in wrongful convictions. The review went beyond transcripts of testimony to analyze all forensic science evidence used in the cases, and found that in more than 50% of the first 225 DNA exonerations, unvalidated or improper forensics played a role in the wrongful conviction. Learn more about the Innocence Project study here. (PDF)
Garrett said studies like these are rare, despite the fact that the systematic review of wrongful conviction cases can reveal a great deal about the causes of wrongful conviction.
“These trial transcripts were fascinating to read, because in retrospect we know that all of the defendants were innocent,” he said. “Yet few have looked at these records. Even after these wrongful convictions came to light, crime laboratories rarely conducted audits or investigations to review the forensic evidence presented at the trial.”
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
An Overhaul of the Forensic System
Posted: March 18, 2009 5:51 pm
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony today from the co-chairman of the National Academy of Sciences committee that recently released a report calling for the creation of an independent agency to oversee and support forensic science in our criminal courts.
Former Judge Harry Edwards told members of the Judiciary Committee that the committee was “thoroughly convinced” that it was time to move from the current forensic science system, “which is dysfunctional.”
“The principal point of our report is simple,” Edwards said in his testimony today. “There’s an obvious need to overhaul the existing system of forensic science in the United States. …Unfortunately, adversarial approach to the submission of evidence in court is not well-suited to the task of finding scientific truth. Judicial review alone will not cure the ills of the forensic science community.”Watch a video of Edwards’ testimony and questioning from Senators.
Download the National Academy of Sciences report and learn more about unvalidated or improper science as a contributing cause of wrongful convictions.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Friday Roundup: Seeking A Clean Slate
Posted: March 20, 2009 5:19 pm
It was another busy week in the innocence movement – with testimony on forensics before the Senate Judiciary Committee and Mississippi adopting DNA access and evidence preservation laws. Here are some more stories on wrongful convictions and forensic evidence from around the world in the last few days:
Sean Hodgson was freed this week in England after serving 27 years in prison for a rape and murder DNA now proves he didn’t commit. He petitioned for DNA testing more than a decade ago but was told – falsely – that evidence in his case had been destroyed. Testing on that evidence finally proved his innocence this year.
Two Illinois men who were pardoned in the 1990s after serving years in prison were dealt a setback in court this week. Stanley Howard and Dana Holland were seeking to expunge their records of wrongful convictions, but the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that gubernatorial pardons based on innocence do not automatically clear criminal records. Holland was exonerated by DNA testing in 2003 after serving more than 10 years. Howard was sentenced to death based on a confession he says was coerced through torture. He was cleared based on non-DNA evidence.
The Georgia House of Representatives approved a bill today that would compensate John Jerome White with more than $700,000 for the years he spent in prison for a crime he didn’t commit. The bill still needs to be approved by the Senate and signed by the Governor before White is compensated. Georgia is one of 25 states without a statewide compensation law; but the legislature has passed bills in recent years compensating individuals.
A story on National Public Radio’s Day to Day this week explored the fallibility of eyewitness identification evidence. In a guest post on the Innocence Blog yesterday from Erin Torneo explored the story behind the new book “Picking Cotton” and the ripples of injustice still felt 11 years after a wrongful conviction.
And the Los Angeles Times considers questions raised about fingerprint evidence by the recent National Academy of Sciences report on forensics.
Tags: Dana Holland, John Jerome White, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Scent Lineups and Unvalidated Science
Posted: June 30, 2009 5:16 pm
Dog scent evidence has contributed to at least three wrongful convictions later overturned by DNA testing, and two new lawsuits in Texas allege that three police dogs working with the Fort Bend County’s Sheriff’s Department implicated innocent people in failed “scent lineups.” Both men have been cleared, but the controversy over the validity of dog scent evidence continues. A new USA Today article examines the Texas lawsuits and the controversy over whether dog scent evidence should be allowed in criminal trials:
The legal challenges are "a first for us," says Randall Morse, an assistant county attorney who is representing (dog handler Keith) Pikett. He says the hounds have worked about 2,000 cases across the country, including the search for Olympic Park bomber Eric Rudolph.Unvalidated forensic science such as dog scent evidence has been involved in about half of the 240 wrongful convictions overturned to date in the United States. A National Academy of Sciences report released this year calls for the creation of a federal agency to support and oversee forensics to prevent wrongful convictions and ensure public safety .
Defense lawyers say the (scent lineup) technique smacks of forensic voodoo and casts further suspicion on the broader use of scent dog evidence.
"It's a fraud on so many levels," says Jeffrey Weiner, former president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Read the full story here. (USA Today, 06/30/09)
The Innocence Project supports the creation of a federal Office of Forensic Science Improvement and Support
and thousands of people have joined the campaign by signing the Just Science Coalition’s petition calling for federal forensic oversight. Add your name now.
Read more about the three men who were wrongfully convicted based in part on dog scent evidence and then exonerated by DNA testing:
Wilton Dedge, Florida
William Dillon, Florida
James Ochoa, California
Tags: Wilton Dedge, William Dillon, James Ochoa, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Forensics in the News
Posted: August 17, 2009 3:42 pm
CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" launches a new series tonight investigating faulty forensic science around the United States and proposed reforms that could prevent wrongful convictions. Tonight's episode is expected to feature an interview with Innocence Project client Ernest Sonnier. Tune in at 10 p.m. EST.
In another case involving faulty forensic testing, The Oregon Attorney General's office recently said prisoner Philip Scott Cannon should be freed while prosecutors consider a new trial. He was convicted of three murders based in part on bullet lead analysis, which has since been discredited.
Read more about forensics in the news and take action to support federal forensic reform.
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Forensics Series Continues Tonight on CNN
Posted: August 20, 2009 3:15 pm
CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” has been investigating questions about forensic disciplines in a special series on forensics this week. Last night, CNN contributor Sanjay Gupta visited the Georgia Bureau of Investigation crime lab to report on hair analysis, bullet analysis and DNA testing practices. Watch video of his visit here.
And CNN medical producer Stephanie Smith posted on the AC360 blog today about Innocence Project client Steven Barnes and the role of unvalidated forensics in wrongful convictions.
The show continues tonight at 10 p.m. ET with a report on Dr. Steven Hayne in Mississippi, who has been accused of reaching conclusions that go beyond science to fit what prosecutors need to secure convictions. Tonight's broadcast will feature an interview with Tyler Edmonds, who was sentenced to death row partly as a result of Hayne's testimony. Edmonds was released after the Mississippi Supreme Court threw out his conviction -- in a ruling that called Hayne's testimony "scientifically unfounded."
Two Innocence Project clients were exonerated last year after Hayne's testimony contributed to their wrongful convictions; read more about their cases here.
Learn about recommendations for forensic reform and take action at the Just Science website.
Tags: Steven Barnes, Kennedy Brewer, Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
The Wrong Prints: Man Arrested for a Robbery he Didn’t Commit
Posted: September 3, 2009 5:26 pm
Dwight Gomas spent 17 months in jail in New York awaiting trial for a robbery he didn’t commit before detectives discovered that his fingerprints didn’t match crime scene evidence. He was set free after the error was uncovered and recently settled a lawsuit against the city for $145,000.
A New York detective conducting a routine review of crime scene evidence discovered that fingerprints allegedly tying the Georgia native to the robbery were actually not a match. Gomas was more than 800 miles away, in Atlanta, when the crime happened.
"It's just a nightmare knowing that someone that's innocent can be picked up off the street and held," Gomas said in court papers. "That scares me now. It's like I'm walking on eggshells. I try to cover my tracks for everywhere I go."Another man, Stephan Cowans, spent more than five years in Massachusetts prisons after a false fingerprint match led to his conviction for a crime he didn’t commit. A report from the National Academy of Sciences released this year found that fingerprint analysis was among the forensic disciplines that has not “been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainly, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source.” Learn more about the NAS report and recommendations for federal forensic reform at the Just Science Coalition website.
Read the full story. (New York Daily News, 9/3/09)
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Watch Live: Senate Judiciary Hearing on Forensic Reform
Posted: September 8, 2009 5:56 pm
Watch online tomorrow at 10 a.m. EST as Innocence Project Co-Director Peter Neufeld testifies before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on the need for a National Institute of Forensic Science. He will be joined by Law Professor Paul Giannelli, Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt, a lab director and two prosecutors.
Visit this link at 10 a.m. EST to watch live.
The Innocence Project has called for the creation of an independent federal agency to support and oversee forensic science practices across the country. Learn more and voice your support for forensic reform at the Just Science Coalition website.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Senators Consider Federal Forensic Reforms
Posted: September 9, 2009 5:42 pm
Innocence Project Co-Director Peter Neufeld testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee today about the need for federal standards and for research in forensic science. And Neufeld and other witnesses found bipartisan support for a federal role in stimulating research, training forensic analysts and setting standards.
Forensics have been a central part of the criminal justice system for decades. Defendants are regularly convicted of crimes based on analysis of fingerprints, hair samples or blood spatters from a crime scene. A recent report by the National Academy of Sciences said many of those techniques have never been scientifically tested.With Neufeld at today’s hearing was Roy Brown, who spent 15 years in prison in New York for a murder he didn’t commit. He was convicted based in large part on faulty bite mark analysis.
That report "is one of the most important developments in forensic science since the creation of the first crime laboratory in the 1920s," Case Western Reserve professor Paul Gianelli told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sen. Al Franken (D-MI) called the report's conclusions "damning" and "terrifying."
"The forensic dentist [at Roy Brown's trial] used what was then the prevailing method of comparing bite marks found on a body with the dentures of a suspect," said Neufeld. "He examined them and decided that he had a match with Roy's bite. He so testified in court, and Roy was convicted."
Read (and listen to) the full story. (NPR All Things Considered, 09/09/09)Watch a webcast of the full hearing.
Take action today: Tell Congress you support the creation of the National Institute of Forensic Science.
Tags: Roy Brown, Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Deadline Extended: Help Us Pay for DNA Testing
Posted: September 24, 2009 2:05 pm
We have been honored and moved by the strong interest in our campaign this month to raise funds for client DNA testing. We deeply appreciate the generosity of hundreds of people from all over the world who have given so far this month. It is thanks to your support that we are able to free the innocent.
We have just $5,470 to go in order to reach our goal of $25,000 and we think we can make it. That’s why we extended the deadline to September 30. For one more week, you can donate here and 100% of your gift will go to support DNA testing.
Spreading the word about this work is critical as well - click here to post this campaign to Facebook and here to post on Twitter.
Thank you from all of us at the Innocence Project.
Tags: False Confessions, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Informants/Snitches, Bad Lawyering, Government Misconduct, Eyewitness Misidentification
Police Dogs and Unvalidated Forensics
Posted: November 4, 2009 1:57 pm
Two lawsuits being filed today in federal court allege that a Texas dog handler used unreliable methods to “justify police agencies’ suspicions” and falsely accuse two men of crimes they didn’t commit.
The cases come as dog scent evidence – and “scent lineups” in particular (where dogs examine a group of scents including a suspect’s) – are under fire in several states across the country. Testimony from dog handlers has played a role in at least three wrongful convictions overturned through DNA testing to date. It is one of the forensic disciplines used in American courtrooms despite a lack of scientific validation to determine whether it is accurate.
The New York Times reports today on scent lineups and police dog evidence, pointing to a recent study on the issue by the Innocence Project of Texas, which estimates that 10 to 15 people are in prison solely on the testimony of one sheriff’s deputy – Keith Pikett – who is named in the federal lawsuits filed today.
Critics (of scent lineups) say that the possibilities of cross-contamination of scent are great, and that the procedures are rarely well controlled. Nonetheless, although some courts have rejected evidence from them, the technique has been used in many states, including Alaska, Florida, New York and Texas, said Lawrence J. Myers, an associate professor of animal behavior at the Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine.Earlier this year, the National Academy of Sciences released a groundbreaking report showing that many forensic disciplines – such as bite marks, fiber analysis and toolmarks – lack scientific rigor. The report calls on Congress to create a federal entity to stimulate research, set standards and enforce those standards.
Read the full story here. (New York Times, 11/4/09)
Visit the Just Science Coalition website for more on the NAS report and progress implementing its critical reccomendtations.
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Dog Scent
A Canadian Mother Is Cleared in Her Son’s Death
Posted: December 8, 2009 2:20 pm
In 1999, facing devastating testimony from a man considered at the time to be one of the world’s leading pediatric pathologists and a possible life sentence, Sherry Sherret-Robinson pled guilty to suffocating her four-month-old son, something she had always said she didn’t do.
Yesterday, she was cleared. A panel of three Ontario judges set aside her conviction, saying she had been wrongfully convicted. The work of Dr. Charles Smith, the pathologist who testified that Sherret-Robinson’s son had been asphyxiated, has been discredited in recent years. Sherret-Robinson is the second person cleared of a conviction based on faulty testimony from Smith, and nearly 30 additional cases are under review.
The wrongful conviction has taken a toll on her life, reports the Toronto Star. She served a year in prison before being released, and also lost custody of her eldest son. She has struggled to find work due to her criminal record and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.
Read the full story – and more on the other pending Smith cases. (Toronto Star, 12/08/09)
Unvalidated or improper forensics, including faulty testimony from medical examiners, has been a factor in at least half of the wrongful convictions overturned through DNA testing to date. Learn more about forensics as a cause of wrongful conviction here.
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Forensics and the Gates Case
Posted: December 16, 2009 5:11 pm
As we reported yesterday, Donald Eugene Gates was freed in Arizona after serving nearly three decades behind bars for a Washington, D.C., crime he didn’t commit. An examination of the forensics behind his wrongful conviction makes a strong case for federal forensic reform to prevent injustices like this in the future.
FBI forensic analyst Michael Malone testified at Gates’ trial in 1982 that hairs found at the scene of the 1981 rape and murder were “microscopically indistinguishable” from Gates’ hairs. His statements vastly overstated the possible conclusions that could be drawn from a hair comparison. Unlike some other forensic disciplines (DNA testing, blood type testing), hair comparison analysis can only reveal potential similarities between specimens, not the statistical likelihood that two specimens might share common characteristics.
Although Malone’s forensic conclusions have been challenged in other cases, and a 1997 Justice Department review discredited his work, no formal review of his convictions has ever been conducted. The Judge who presided over the Gates case recently ordered the U.S. Attorney’s Office to conduct such a review.
Gates joins a growing group of exonerees whose wrongful convictions were caused, at least in part, by unvalidated or improper forensic science. More than 100 people have been exonerated through DNA testing after unvalidated or improper forensic science contributed to their wrongful conviction (flawed analysis of hair was a factor in many of those cases).The National Academy of Sciences has reported a systemic lack of forensic standards and oversight and has proposed the creation of an independent federal agency to oversee the forensic sciences. According to a report released by the National Academy of Sciences earlier this year, microscopic hair analysis is not a valid science.
In response to the groundbreaking NAS report finding serious problems with forensic science nationwide, the Innocence Project recently drafted a proposal for federal legislation to create the a federal Office of Forensic Science Improvement and Support (OFSIS). The office would be established within the Department of Commerce, which would help define the office’s agenda for research. OFSIS would also engage existing government entities to regulate the mandatory accreditation of crime labs and certification of forensic practitioners; support science-based education and training throughout the criminal justice system; provide periodic needs assessments of the forensic system; and oversee compliance. To learn more and sign a petition in support of the agency visit the Just Science Coalition website.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Ten Great Moments of the Decade
Posted: December 30, 2009 11:00 am
It goes without saying that DNA testing and the issues surrounding wrongful convictions have left their mark on the criminal justice system in the last ten years. When the decade began, DNA testing had been used in American courtrooms for more than 11 years, but exonerations were still fairly rare.
In the last ten years, 182 people have been exonerated through DNA testing and states have passed dozens of laws addressing the causes of wrongful convictions. Yet there is plenty of work to do — countless innocent people remain behind bars as we pass into 2010 and the threat of wrongful convictions in today’s courtrooms is still very real.
As we look forward to freeing more innocent people than ever in the decade ahead and enacting major reforms to prevent wrongful convictions, here is a list (in chronological order) of 10 seminal moments from the 2000s.
"Actual Innocence” is published (2000)— Written by Innocence Project Co-Directors Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, with Jim Dwyer, this groundbreaking book examines the emergence of DNA testing and the causes of wrongful conviction it unveiled. During the decade, it became a blueprint for overturning wrongful convictions and reforming the criminal justice system.
Larry Mayes becomes the 100th Exoneree (2001) — Mayes spent 21 years in Indiana prisons before DNA testing obtained by the Innocence Project and the Innocence Project at the Indiana University School of Law proved his innocence and led to his release.
Illinois clears death row (2003) — Pointing clearly to the frightening rate of exonerations in his state (since 1977, 13 death row prisoners had been cleared while 12 had been executed), Gov. George Ryan granted blanket clemency to all 167 people on death row on January 10, 2003.
Congress passes the Justice for All Act (2004) — The JFAA is the most significant legislation to ever address wrongful convictions in the United States. It provides an avenue for federal prisoners to seek DNA testing and funds incentives for states to offer similar testing and to improve DNA testing capacity. It also provides compensation for federal exonerees.
“After Innocence” premieres (2005) — An award-winning documentary chronicling the lives of seven men released from prison after serving years for crimes they didn’t commit, After Innocence brought the issue of wrongful convictions to America’s movie theaters and living rooms. Watch a trailer here.
“The Innocent Man” published (2006) — John Grisham’s first non-fiction book tells the heartbreaking story of a murder in Oklahoma and an unimaginable injustice suffered by two innocent men. The book reached best-seller status around the world and a film version is in development. Following the book’s publication, John Grisham joined the Innocence Project’s board of directors. Several other excellent books also chronicled wrongful conviction cases during the decade, check back tomorrow for the decade's must read list.
Jerry Miller becomes the 200th Exoneree (2007) — It took 12 years to exonerate the first 100 people through DNA testing. It was just seven years later that Innocence Project client Jerry Miller became the 200th person exonerated through DNA. He served 25 years in Illinois prisons before he was cleared.
Dennis Fritz and Peggy Carter Sanders Dance on Stage (2008) — the history of criminal justice in the United States is filled with poignant moments of injustice overturned, from tear-filled homecomings to stirring speeches and courtroom victories. One of the most memorable is the moment Dennis Fritz, who was exonerated after 11 years in prison for an Oklahoma murder he didn’t commit, unexpectedly danced onstage with the mother of the murder victim at a New York event. Watch this touching moment on video here.
50th Member Joins the Innocence Network (2008) — the Innocence Network is an international affiliation of groups working to overturn wrongful convictions. As the field has broadened over the last 10 years, more organizations have been created to meet the growing need for pro bono legal services and advocacy. In 2008, the Innocence Network reached a membership of 50 organizations, today there are 54.
National Academy of Sciences releases forensic report (2009) — Faulty forensic evidence played a role in more than half of the wrongful convictions later overturned through DNA testing. Many forensic techniques used in courtrooms today have never been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation. In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences released a landmark report calling for the U.S. federal government to create a federal entity to oversee and support the forensic disciplines. Learn more here.
Photo: Innocence Project client Luis Diaz was exonerated in Florida in 2005 after 25 years in prison for a series of crimes he didn't commit. Courtesy South Florida Sun Sentinel.
Tags: Innocence Commissions, Exoneree Compensation, False Confessions, Eyewitness Identification, Forensic Oversight, Evidence Preservation, Access to DNA Testing, False Confessions, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Informants/Snitches, Bad Lawyering, Government Misconduct, Eyewitness Misidentification
Video: Forensics in Context
Posted: March 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Federal Judge Questions Forensic Reliability
Posted: March 29, 2010 5:05 pm
More than half the 252 wrongful convictions overturned through DNA testing to date involved unvalidated or improper forensic science at trial.
Read more about the National Academy of Sciences report and join the call for federal forensic oversight at the Just Science Coalition website.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Time Magazine: Death and Innocence
Posted: May 21, 2010 10:15 am
San Jacinto County district attorney Bill Burnett, a former probation officer whose lawyer describes him as "a very capable prosecutor but a simple guy in his philosophy of things," says that under Texas law, only the defendant himself can ask for a new DNA test. "Once the defendant has been executed, I can do nothing more in the case," he said in a deposition. He plans to destroy the hair as soon as he's legally permitted to, closing the book on the only death sentence his small county has ever handed down. Both sides expect a ruling soon.
Jones was convicted of murdering liquor-store owner Allen Hilzendager after driving to the store with paroled murderer Danny Dixon. Either Jones or Dixon walked into Hilzendager’s store and shot him three times. The gun belonged to a friend of Dixon’s, Timothy Mark Jordan, who said that Jones confessed to him. A single hair discovered on the store counter was examined under a microscope—a technique that hasn’t changed much in over 100 years. The crime lab expert said the hair “matched” Jones – a scientifically impossible conclusion.
The proposed mitochondrial DNA testing could identify the hair with far more accuracy than the previous microscope test, and Time reports that the test results could close the case:
Mitochondrial DNA is exclusionary evidence, which means that if the hair is tested and Jones is not excluded, then he was the shooter. The same goes for Dixon. But if they are both excluded, then the hair belonged to someone who wasn't involved in the crime at all. That wouldn't mean Jones didn't do it, but it would still be troubling to know that the only piece of physical evidence that sent a man to his death was actually completely unrelated to the crime.
Read the full article here.
See the timeline of events in Jones’ case here.
Read the Innocence Project’s press release on seeking DNA testing in Jones’ case.
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Death Penalty, Claude Jones
Former Nebraska Forensic Analyst Sentenced to Prison
Posted: June 2, 2010 1:45 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Crime Lab Problems Continue to Plague Houston
Posted: June 28, 2010 6:19 pm
Defense attorney Patrick F. McCann wrote in an op-ed this weekend that the problem in Houston’s lab makes clear the need for forensic oversight:
Our leaders should create a regional crime lab, actually run by scientists, perhaps under a university, and not under any elected sheriff or appointed law enforcement officer, that can run actual, neutral and competent forensic testing untainted by pressure and uncorrupted by malfeasance or negligence. The people accused of crimes are owed that much. We as taxpayers are owed that much.
The Innocence Project is a member of the Just Science coalition, which supports federal and state support, research and oversight of forensic disciplines in the United States to ensure public safety and prevent wrongful convictions. Learn more about federal forensic reform efforts here.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Fingerprints
Science Thursday - A Blood-Based Age Test?
Posted: November 25, 2010 8:25 am
Police in Taos, NM used voice analysis to charge a man for calling in bomb threats to local schools.
Two Texas men were convicted of infecting women with HIV based on a genetic test created by Texas university researchers.
Investigative reporters question the work of the Ramsey and Washington County Chief Medical Examiner, who also contracts with 13 counties in Minnesota, in two possible cases of wrongful conviction.
Radley Balko advocates for bifurcated trials as a solution to prevent more wrongful convictions.
The National Football League is using digital forensics to investigate inappropriate text exchanges by its players.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Science Thursdays: Crime Lab Problems, Animal Forensics and a New "Body Farm"
Posted: December 9, 2010 12:04 pm
A crime scene reconstruction expert reviewed evidence in Amanda Knox’s murder conviction in Italy. According to the expert, the crime was the work of a single perpetrator.
New Jersey’s Health and Human Services' Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team includes a forensic odontologist who also consults with the State Police Office of Forensic Sciences.
The Michigan State Legislature approved funding for a $15M Detroit facility to house the Detroit fire and police headquarters and a new crime laboratory.
The Canadian government is considering whether it will switch to a public-private partnership to replace the Royal Canadian Mounted Police’s (RCMP) troubled forensic laboratories and services.
Bode Technology Group, a major forensic DNA company, was sold to SolutionPoint International for $30.5 M.
A Pennsylvania man donated land to California University of Pennsylvania's Institute of Criminological and Forensic Sciences for a “body farm”.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
The Pseudo-Science of Dexter
Posted: December 13, 2010 4:15 pm
Seemingly convinced by Dexter’s skills as a blood spatter analyst, I walked over to Sarah Chu’s office to do my own investigating. Chu is the Innocence Project Forensic Policy Associate, and if anyone could tell me the truth about bloodstain pattern analysis, it would be her.
Chu informed me that there are indeed serious questions about the reliability of bloodstain analysis. Only two of the professional organizations for blood pattern “experts” have any requirements for membership, and only one of them has an educational requirement.
Chu reminded me that just because there are organizations devoted to analyzing bloodstain patterns, it doesn’t mean the technique is scientifically accepted. The NAS report reveals that blood pattern analysts are more subjective than scientific and that many cases involving the technique have targeted requests from either the defense or prosecution which can lead to partiality. Just recently, a Connecticut defense attorney challenged the legitimacy of the practice in a murder case.
My opinion of “Dexter” has changed a bit. The suspense still drives me to cover my eyes when the scary music comes on, and I do love the imaginative plot lines. But, I’m disappointed to realize I was fooled by the apparent science of Dexter’s blood analysis. Not only is he a part time serial killer, his profession has been proven neither valid nor reliable.
Image: Michael C. Hall as Dexter and Chris Vance as Cole Harmon. Photo: Randy Tepper/Showtime
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Science Thursday: Questions Surround Death Investigations
Posted: February 3, 2011 8:10 pm
Dane County, WI, welcomes its first medical examiner, who hails from New York City, as it replaces its coroner system.
Scottish scientists from Abertay University worked with the Scottish Police to develop a technique to lift fingerprints off fabric. While the research demonstrates that this technique is possible, scientists warn that it is not a silver bullet.
Forensic botany can be used to evaluate an alibi or assist in determining time since death.
A West Virginia forensic chemistry professor received a grant from the National Institute of Justice to study factors that affect interpretation of data by fire debris analysts and the associated error rate.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Science Thursday
Posted: May 26, 2011 7:45 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Science Thursday: Questioning Science in the Courtroom
Posted: June 9, 2011 9:45 am
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Is the "CSI Effect" Real?
Posted: June 24, 2011 3:50 pm
One 2006 study, from a judge and two Eastern Michigan University law professors, found that crime-drama viewers had a higher expectation for forensic evidence, but their votes to convict or acquit weren't affected. (Summary here, full study PDF here). Another, from two Arizona State professors in 2007, found that CSI-lovers were more skeptical of questionable forensics and more confident of their verdicts, but their verdicts also weren't significantly different from jurors who didn't watch these shows.
Interestingly, a 2009 Purdue study found that crime-drama viewers vastly overestimate the amount of violent crime in the U.S.
We asked our Facebook community this week whether CSI-style shows have an impact on criminal trials, and we heard thoughtful analysis from many sides of the argument. A few of your Facebook comments:
Dan B.: “People believe that cases are more easily solved, not realizing that the show does not represent the amount of time it takes to actually get something done. They make it look too easy; almost magical.”
Candise W.: “These shows have greatly influenced defendants inability to get a fair trial. Most have no clue about the court system and how it works. I see people right now watching a trial and wanting it to hurry along thinking I suppose it should be over in an hour.”
Tyler A.: I think it creates a sense that law enforcement uses scientific standards for all cases. I think it hinders our ability to have unbiased juries.
These shows don’t seem to be going anywhere, so the debate over the existence of a “CSI Effect” is sure to go on.
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Tonight on "Frontline:" A Close Look at Child Death Cases
Posted: June 28, 2011 10:51 am
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Science Thursday
Posted: July 7, 2011 5:43 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Iowa Adopts Arson Reforms
Posted: July 7, 2011 5:48 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Cameron Todd Willingham
Friday Roundup: The Long Road to Prove Innocence
Posted: July 22, 2011 1:45 pm
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Fixing Forensics
Posted: August 3, 2011 5:45 pm
Tags: Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Mississippi Woman Convicted Despite Unreliable Testimony
Posted: August 11, 2011 6:01 pm
"The use of Michael West as an expert at any point in time was inexcusable," the organization's director, Tucker Carrington, says. "There was never any basis for his work to be considered valid as a forensic science. But using him in this case in 2001, after his work had been discredited, and after the FBI's experts had reported that they could not see anything in that videotape, that's really a new low."
…
"Michael West was presenting bogus evidence," Carrington says. "Prosecutors ought to be racing to identify and re-investigate cases where West was involved, not waiting for defense attorneys to discover them -- much less defend his testimony or work in those cases."
Read the full article.
Read more about Kennedy Brewer and Levon Brooks
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Friday Roundup: Compensation, Real Perpetrators and the Death Penalty
Posted: January 20, 2012 1:00 pm
Tags: Ohio, Texas, Washington, New York, Exoneree Compensation, Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Life After Exoneration, Death Penalty, Real Perpetrator
PBS Reveals “The Real CSI” Tonight
Posted: April 17, 2012 12:02 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics
Forensic Practitioners' Credentials Come Under Fire
Posted: April 18, 2012 3:00 pm
Tags: Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, NAS Report
Petition for Cameron Todd Willingham's Posthumous Pardon
Posted: October 24, 2012 2:55 pm
Tags: Texas, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Cameron Todd Willingham
Dallas Morning News Stresses Importance of Arson Review
Posted: January 10, 2013 4:50 pm
Tags: Texas, Forensic Oversight, Unvalidated/Improper Forensics, Cameron Todd Willingham


















